Election

JUST-IN: Senators Release Statement Explaining Why They’re Objecting on Jan. 6

Share Now
  • 19.8K
  •  
  • 12.8K
  •  
  •  
    32.6K
    Shares

Jan. 2, 2021

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Kennedy (R-La.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Senators-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), and Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) issued the following statement in advance of the Electoral College certification process on January 6, 2021:

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.

“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.

“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.

“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).

“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.

“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.

“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.

“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.

“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

“We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.

“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”


Share Now
  • 19.8K
  •  
  • 12.8K
  • 2
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
    32.6K
    Shares

Categories: Election

3 replies »

  1. I think mail in ballot should not be allowed reason being bc how can you show the ID and signature so how can that be no way also my dads mail comes to me he passed away 2 yrs in March and I received one in his name so therefore I tore it up in small pieces then me and my significant other received mail in ballots and we done early voted so in my house hold got 3 that were no good so count the ppl in the USA and take away the ones away that are not old enough and you tell me how that adds up it doesn’t this had been the most crooked election I’ve ever been part of !!! And it will not add up I thght that was for them to know how many and the numbers just don’t add up an it doesn’t add up they are so busted … I pray all this is going to prevail that Donal Trump should be our president for 4 more years this country will be run right and that he fired all the snakes in the FBI & CIA and get rid of Nancy and shumer he just needs to deep clean the staff of ppl who are there for you and us and they have failed and Hunter Biden I’m not sure why he’s not in jail with his dad and all the Clinton’s Obama enough is enough and the media needs to get with the program … Trump has been to quite doer better get rest!!!!

  2. J do not think nancy Polanski or mr McConnell should have the right to form a agreement to voters frude wee the people need to have the evidence brought forth and dealt with for the truth. No more sweeping the truth under the rug we need answers now to save america

  3. I truly believe, the election fraud was directedr by Democrats. The American people deserve better and Pelosi and Schumer are the most corrupt representatives in the house and senate, and will do all they can to steal elections and sink America.

Tell the Wiz what you think!